August 22, 2008

Not actually an improvement.

Posted by apostropher

Jonathan Franzen:

Just 10 years ago, New York City (where I live) still abounded with collectively maintained public spaces in which citizens demonstrated respect for their community by not inflicting their banal bedroom lives on it. The world 10 years ago was not yet fully conquered by yak. It was still possible to see the use of Nokias as an ostentation or an affectation of the affluent. Or, more generously, as an affliction or a disability or a crutch. There was unfolding, after all, in New York in the late 1990s, a seamless citywide transition from nicotine culture to cellular culture. One day the lump in the shirt pocket was Marlboros, the next day it was Motorola. One day the vulnerably unaccompanied pretty girl was occupying her hands and mouth and attention with a cigarette, the next day she was occupying them with a very important conversation with a person who wasn't you. One day a crowd gathered around the first kid on the playground with a pack of Kools, the next day around the first kid with a color screen. One day travelers were clicking lighters the second they were off an airplane, the next day they were speed-dialing. Pack-a-day habits became hundred-dollar monthly Verizon bills. Smoke pollution became sonic pollution. Although the irritant changed overnight, the suffering of a self-restrained majority at the hands of a compulsive minority, in restaurants and airports and other public spaces, remained eerily constant. Back in 1998, not long after I'd quit cigarettes, I would sit on the subway and watch other riders nervously folding and unfolding phones, or nibbling on the teatlike antennae that all the phones then had, or just quietly clutching their devices like a mother's hand, and I would feel something close to sorry for them. It still seemed to me an open question how far the trend would go: whether New York truly wanted to become a city of phone addicts sleepwalking down the sidewalks in icky little clouds of private life, or whether the notion of a more restrained public self might somehow prevail.


Comments
1

That guy should try writing a novel. Something tells me he'd do a helluva job.

Posted by: NCProsecutor at August 23, 2008 01:01 PM
2

Jonathan Franzen is the author of the novels The Twenty-Seventh City, Strong Motion, and The Corrections, as well as the nonfiction works How to Be Alone and The Discomfort Zone.

Posted by: brownbuffalo at August 23, 2008 06:29 PM
3

BB, do you have that tragic genetic flaw where you can't understand a joke?

Posted by: bitchphd at August 24, 2008 12:58 AM
4

BPHD, no.

Posted by: at August 24, 2008 12:28 PM
5

I am familiar with all internet traditions.

Posted by: at August 24, 2008 05:54 PM
6

3: Geez, BPhD, give recruiting people to join your Humorless People Club a rest once in a while, why don't ya?

Posted by: M/tch M/lls at August 24, 2008 06:54 PM
7

Jonathan Franzen is the author of the novels The Twenty-Seventh City, Strong Motion, and The Corrections, as well as the nonfiction works How to Be Alone and The Discomfort Zone.

plus, the forthcoming book, the restrained public self: NYC in the seventies.

Posted by: Lemmy Caution at August 25, 2008 02:38 PM
8

I just don't get this thread at all.

Is there a club for humorless people? If so, I hope no one tries to whack me with it.

Posted by: TokyoTom at August 25, 2008 10:51 PM
9

what does it mean 'conquered by yak'? hopefully it's not some kind of racist idiom
this franzen guy seems to be a pro-affluent snob, that i got and that he is anti-cell phone use

Posted by: read at August 26, 2008 04:10 PM
10

Yakking is talking. Not the animal.

Posted by: apostropher at August 26, 2008 04:22 PM
11

OTOH it completely changes the reading of the paragraph -- in a pleasantly surreal way -- if you assume he is lamenting the conquest of the world by our yak overlords.

Posted by: Clownęsthesiologist at August 26, 2008 04:36 PM
12

so ka, well, good for him

Posted by: read at August 26, 2008 04:37 PM
13

Yeah and god only knows what carcinogenic effects cell phones have. No the radiation is not ionizing and not directly mutagenic, but it does warm the brain, perhaps influencing things like efficiency of protein folding, transcription, DNA repair, and mitochondrial electron transport. I can't begin to understand what might be going on.

For all I know, cigarettes could be healthier. Not that cigarettes are at all healthy. But to some of us they do add life to our ears, before emphysema sets in..

By the way, there are some very powerful genetic markers in existence which can more or less predict emphysema predilection....


Posted by: Jon at August 26, 2008 09:32 PM
14

Wow -- that thread is much longer than last time I read it. Bears certain similarities to the Anti-christ thread over here.

Posted by: Clownæsthesiologist at August 27, 2008 06:52 AM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?