August 22, 2008

Puh-leeze.

Posted by apostropher

I guess I've resigned myself to whichever of the supremely uninspiring people on Obama's VP shortlist gets selected. Even if it's Clinton or Bayh, which would create a nose-holding situation as bad or worse than Al Gore's horrible pick of Holy Joe Lieberman. I'm still hoping a surprise pick from outside the list gets announced tomorrow, but I'm used to being disappointed. While reading speculation about the choice, I came across this article stating that Hillary Clinton is still $24 million dollars in debt and, to nobody's surprise, is having trouble raising the money to retire it. This, though, made my jaw drop.

The report comes as some high-profile Clinton backers have expressed disappointment Obama has not made more of an effort to help his onetime rival retire her campaign debt.

"He has provided her with a pittance compared to what the Clintons have given Obama," prominent Clinton backer Lynn Forrester told the Times of London. "Her debt could have been cleared within 10 days. It's ungracious."

Ungracious you say, Ms. Forrester de Rothschild? Let's see, the Clinton campaign ran up most of that debt after the electoral math was clear that she couldn't win, while running a highly negative campaign saying McCain was more qualified than Obama to be commander-in-chief. It certainly *would* be very gracious to remove $24 million dollars from his general election war chest and transfer it to cover the costs of her futile scorched earth campaign that probably helped McCain pull close to a tie in the polls. Yes, that would be gracious indeed.

But Obama has hardly cleared the ungracious bar. He has, after all, refrained from sucker-punching her on national television, which would have been my first instinct (and one more of the myriad reasons I'll likely never hold public office). Moreover, if I had to guess, I'd say she's still got no worse than a 50-50 shot at being the name announced tomorrow.

I've said it before and I'm sure I'll say it again: Democrats only stop forming circular firing squads long enough to eat their young. Sigh.


Comments
1

It might have been gracious of Obama to cut a check to eliminate Clinton's campaign debts, but as I understand it, it would also have been illegal - one campaign can't simply send funds to another like that.

Posted by: Gabriel at August 22, 2008 02:58 PM
2

Biden. He picked Biden. Of all the nice, friendly neighborhood democrats out there, he had to pick that pompous, arrogant, bullying sliverback, Joe Biden. And in a state like Delaware no less that votes Democrat almost every time....

Sure hope they don't pull a JFK on Obama; if i were him I'd have someone watching my back and it wouldn't be JB.


Posted by: Jon at August 23, 2008 03:19 PM
3

The Biden pick at least makes strategic sense, though. Biden is going to be the campaign's hatchet man in response to the negative campaign that McCain's is clearly going to run. He's going to be the one designated to swing for McCain's nuts.

Whatever else he does or doesn't bring to the table, he's pretty good at that sort of thing.

Posted by: apostropher at August 23, 2008 03:30 PM
4

Biden is belligerent, a trait shared by most repuglicans and many Americans.
It's Obama's presidency and it's going to be a historic one.
Ms. Forrester de Rothschild can graciously kiss Bill's dick.

Posted by: waldo at August 24, 2008 07:04 AM
5

5: Hope so. Hopefully Obama will lay off the 2nd amendment and not listen to the most strident global warming doomsayers, and focus on bringing the troops home and restoring this country's tarnished image.

Posted by: Jon at August 24, 2008 09:56 PM
6

lay off the 2nd amendment

The national Democratic Party quit fighting that battle a decade ago.

Posted by: apostropher at August 24, 2008 10:01 PM
7

not listen to the most strident global warming doomsayers

Excuse me, Jon?

Any libertarian worth his salt would be using AGW to push at least for deregulation (and efficiency improvements) in the power generation/distribution businesses, more rapid depreciation of capital investments, a shift from taxes on incopme and capital to taxes on "bads", and would recognize that global and regional commons need to be managed.

Posted by: TokyoTom at August 25, 2008 12:54 AM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?