
Left: All the water in the world (1.4087 billion cubic kilometres of it) including sea water, ice, lakes, rivers, ground water, clouds, etc. Right: All the air in the atmosphere (5140 trillion tonnes of it) gathered into a ball at sea-level density. Shown on the same scale as the Earth.
Via jwz.
Does the "air" ball contain all the water vapor in the atmosphere?
Posted by: just john at March 12, 2008 01:55 PMGee, how did they get all the water to stick together like that?
Posted by: Clownæsthesiologist at March 12, 2008 03:30 PMThat's superb. I remember one of the astronauts describing the world's atmosphere as 'like an onion skin'.
So fragile, so precious.
If water vapor, the size would depend on the temperature and pressure. Must be condensed. An even greater technical feat.
Posted by: Cryptic Ned at March 12, 2008 08:00 PMDamn! Put that shit back, man! All the fish will die and everybody'll suffocate!
Posted by: froz gobo at March 13, 2008 12:34 AMI thought Gaia was a feminine representation. How did "she" end up with testicles?
Posted by: Dave McLeod at March 13, 2008 12:42 AM7: Her ovaries are just in closer proximity than most women's.
Posted by: Ashley at March 13, 2008 10:44 AMThanks a great image, Apo, thanks for posting it. We may end up using it in the museum, or our planned extension, some time.
John asked: "Does the "air" ball contain all the water vapor in the atmosphere?"
And it seems, from the Science Photo Library site that the water vapor is accounted for in the water ball, not the air ball. But it is accounted for somewhere.
(Also, PK is thrilled with this picture: "I was RIGHT that the atmosphere has more air than water!" And so he was; he was hypothesizing about this just yesterday.
Posted by: bitchphd at March 13, 2008 11:21 PMNice graphic representation. Perhaps more to the point: Human beings (i.e. consumers and polluters) have a tendency to think of these resources as infinite when in fact they are finite and fragile. And to think the entire biosphere depends on these tiny droplets.
Posted by: swampcracker at March 14, 2008 09:56 AMI think a lower angle shot with the huge ball of water looming up over the horizon (so we get a better sense of how tall it is) would be cool.
Posted by: M/tch M/lls at March 14, 2008 01:02 PMHow come the ball of air casts a shadow?
Posted by: Clownęsthesiologist at March 14, 2008 01:45 PMAlso, the air is pink on the Science Photo Library original. Since it has been changed, I'm curious as to the correlation between air and blue balls?
Posted by: shpx.ohfu at March 14, 2008 06:42 PM16: Because it`s being held in an opaque balloon, naturally. An atmosphere is not needed for objects to cast shadows.
Posted by: TokyoTom at March 20, 2008 03:16 AM