Jardak told the ABC his digital diminishment was sparked by a clash with a female motorist over a lane change. "She started flashing her lights, sticking her finger up, which didn't offend me too much, but then she started to use that [little pinky] gesture and I was offended by it," he said. "So I took offence, because, you know, any man would, and I got a bit angry and we had a bit of an argument, sort of, you know, gestures, and then I just threw my bottle out the window."
The "little pinky" gesture towards a man was akin to sexual assault, Jardak said.
"I just was angry and I threw it out the window, and I ended up hitting her car, and I get charged pretty much for being sexually assaulted by her, you know what I mean," he said. "If I said something about a girl, something she had, if I had mentioned they were small, I think they would be offended, too … I regret it now, but being assaulted has affected me and offended me."
Something seems affected, yes.
Come on, if this were some guy who, say, looked at a woman and made some kind of gesture about her boobs, there would be calls for his head on a plate from the usual suspects. (I'm thinking of m. leblanc's recent sexual-harrassment episode on Unfogged.)
This guy crossed the line by hitting the woman's car with a bottle, but let's end the hypocrisy that says mocking a woman's sexuality is a hanging offense, while mocking a man's is acceptable; that raping a woman is a felony, but raping a man in prison is a punch line; and that beating a woman is shocking, but kicking a man in the nuts is hilarious. It's time to grow up across the board.
Posted by: Gaijin Biker at November 19, 2007 08:17 PMI'm not sure what all that's about, but making a hand gesture is not a sexual assault, no matter how you slice it.
Posted by: apostropher at November 19, 2007 08:53 PMWell it depends on where the hand making the gesture is placed, apo. I mean, if someone flashes you the shocker from another lane, sure, but if they did the same gesture while their hand was in your pants . . . .
But I agree with the first part of your sentence. "Usual suspects"? Opressa please.
Posted by: M/tch M/lls at November 19, 2007 09:13 PMWow that was perhaps as lame in its low caste street way as the aw3s0meX shit-fit that that weird burned-out Protein Wisdom dude and his merciless interlocutors threw at the tbogg web-log the other day; that started out just merely lame but then built, before our eyes, to a magnificent crescendo of rising lame-itude that burst all the way out the dome of the sky into and through Infinity! where (due to the mirror effect, or else taking the long way allaround the entire Cosmos) it became, as I said, aw3s0meX, to the MaXXstr3am!!!1!
Posted by: W. Kiernan at November 19, 2007 09:32 PMDude: it's aw3someXness was beyond linking.
Posted by: Clownæsthesiologist at November 19, 2007 10:07 PMBut my guess is, you should go here for Goldstein-centric hijincks.
Posted by: Clownæsthesiologist at November 19, 2007 10:13 PMWow man. On second thought you might want to avoid it.
Posted by: Clownæsthesiologist at November 19, 2007 10:25 PMDamn
I know -- not even Barack Obama the Antichrist merits that much attention. But about half the comments appear to be posted by PW poster Dan Collins, subject of the post.
Posted by: Clownæsthesiologist at November 19, 2007 10:27 PMPoor Jardak. You spend years in suspended animation traveling from your destroyed home planet to earth, and just when you're starting to feel at home, this happens.
Posted by: mcmc at November 20, 2007 07:26 AM1: GB, it may sound weird coming from me, but lighten up, man.
In other words, Mr. Jardack does, indeed, have a tiny one.
Posted by: bitchphd at November 20, 2007 11:40 AMif they did the same gesture while their hand was in your pants...
They'd jam two fingers.
Posted by: apostropher at November 20, 2007 11:44 AMLamest sexual assault ever.
Lamest response to sexual assault ever.
Posted by: Gaijin Biker at November 20, 2007 12:08 PMThe ad was aimed at young men who are susceptible to taunts of this nature, so as to get them to examine their driving habits. It followed a spate of accidents which involved multiple fatalities of young people.
Like every ill-conceived ad campaign it was counter productive, resulting in in young men responding by taking both hands off the wheel and making a large O with their fingers.
The 'pinky assessment' was not sexual abuse, it was an assessment of the motivation for bad driving.
The dude who threw a bottle in response was a bad- tempered juvenile who'd use any excuse to justify his bad driving and behaviour.
taking both hands off the wheel and making a large O with their fingers
Heh heh heh.
Posted by: apostropher at November 20, 2007 02:23 PM14 made me laugh and laugh.
taking both hands off the wheel and making a large O with their fingers
That reminds me of this.
Posted by: M/tch M/lls at November 20, 2007 11:16 PMCome on, if this were some guy who, say, looked at a woman and made some kind of gesture about her boobs, there would be calls for his head on a plate from the usual suspects. (I'm thinking of m. leblanc's recent sexual-harrassment episode on Unfogged.)
I'm pretty sure if m. leblanc had hit the kid with a bottle, we would have said she was out of line.
Posted by: Cala at November 23, 2007 05:21 PM