November 07, 2007

Jurisdiction

Posted by apostropher

"A French court is having to ponder the sex of angels and what is a reasonable size for bull's testicles."


Comments
1

Mark's got big balls.
John's got big balls.
But Luke's got the biggest,
Balls of them all!

Posted by: Clownæsthesiologist at November 7, 2007 04:04 PM
2

Just wait till they get ahold of that Rumsfeld case.

Posted by: shpx.ohfu at November 8, 2007 07:52 PM
3

Um, isn't the real problem here one of a more than slight entanglement of church and state, rather than one of religion, prudery or artists' rights?

Posted by: TokyoTom at November 8, 2007 10:37 PM
4

Yes, but I'm only in it for the testicles.

Posted by: apostropher at November 9, 2007 10:46 AM
5

Um, isn't the real problem here one of a more than slight entanglement of church and state, rather than one of religion, prudery or artists' rights?

Um, isn't it actually just a civil suit for destruction of property?

Posted by: M/tch M/lls at November 9, 2007 11:40 AM
6

4: Epitaph for the win.

Posted by: shpx.ohfu at November 9, 2007 12:22 PM
7

4: To each his own. You can have your testicles; I`m more interested in nubile angels.

Posted by: TokyoTom at November 10, 2007 11:24 PM
8

You can have your testicles

Thanks. I'm kind of attached to them.

Posted by: apostropher at November 10, 2007 11:47 PM
9

8: Glad to hear it; I'd hate to think of the consequences if you weren't.

However, I was talking about Rocky Mountain oysters, not Rocky Mount oysters; as for the first, I still prefer nubile angels.

Posted by: TokyoTom at November 11, 2007 11:13 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?