I've been baffled at how the national media keeps assigning Rudy Giuliani foreign policy experience when he has precisely zero foreign policy experience. I'm not saying that being mayor of New York isn't a big job, just that it doesn't have jackshit to do with national foreign policy. Now, however, it turns out that not only does Giuliani not have any foreign policy experience, he doesn't seem to even want any.
Rudolph Giuliani's membership on an elite Iraq study panel came to an abrupt end last spring after he failed to show up for a single official meeting of the group, causing the panel's top Republican to give him a stark choice: either attend the meetings or quit, several sources said.
Giuliani left the Iraq Study Group last May after just two months, walking away from a chance to make up for his lack of foreign policy credentials on the top issue in the 2008 race, the Iraq war.
He cited "previous time commitments" in a letter explaining his decision to quit, and a look at his schedule suggests why -- the sessions at times conflicted with Giuliani's lucrative speaking tour that garnered him $11.4 million in 14 months.
Nice. But remember, John Edwards got a fancy haircut and Al Gore uses electricity.
Money and political power. We know the foodstuffs of Giuliani. Hell, his opinions are bought. For the right price, he's an effective leader.
Posted by: John Johnson at June 19, 2007 02:58 PMWhat do you mean? He has plenty of foreign policy experience.
Posted by: Cangrejero at June 19, 2007 03:11 PMTry to imagine how this would play if Giuliani were a Democrat.
Posted by: NCProsecutor at June 19, 2007 04:15 PMGiuliani is yet another Republican warmonger who was of the age to serve in Vietnam, yet somehow decided not to enter the military.
Posted by: Charles Watkins at June 19, 2007 04:43 PMFeh! I remember when Giuliani was famous as The Most Hated Mayor in America. His scheme to "clean up New York" consisted of beating on dark people and moving drug dealers to richer pastures in the hinterlands - where the local cops were overwhelmed by the inevitable spike in crime.
God help us all, if he becomes The Decider.
Homicide victims in NYC back in the high-crime years were disproportionately black. Blacks were the prime beneficiaries of Giuliani's crime crackdown. But do go on believing that he was motivated by an interest in "beating on dark people".
That belief is almost as ignorant as positing that he was "moving drug dealers" out to the suburbs. What, was this a tagging-and-relocation program, like on Mutual of Omaha's Wild Kingdom? Giuliani was mayor of NYC. If criminals decide to get out of Dodge on his watch and ply their trade elsewhere, it's to his credit.
Posted by: Gaijin Biker at June 19, 2007 10:12 PMI realize the Republican base is profoundly, comically stupid, but I ask myself, will they really go for a serial-marrying, pro-choice non-WASP who doesn't seem to hate teh Gay?
Then I realize the Republican base is also profoundly, comically terrified of Scary Brown People, and who better to protect them and their pee-drenched dungarees than Mayor 9/11? His lack of any relevant foreign policy experience would seem superfluous, mere fine print.
Posted by: Stu at June 20, 2007 10:17 AMapo, not that foreign policy credentials really mater to voters, but Giuliani certainly has loads more than GWB had, and some intellectual firepower and curiosity to boot.
And as mayor of NYC, he certainly must have experience in seeing NYC and the US playing a vital role in the world, and a vision that is colored by multiethnic experience. For Republicans, no doubt his main appeal is as a "can do" kinda guy, in the face of terror attacks. Not that I'm touting his candidacy.
Posted by: TokyoTom at June 20, 2007 11:58 AMI believe there is some credence to the fact that violent crime rates were declining everywhere in the country at that time when the economy was booming. Homicide rates were also dropping in NYC towards the end of Dinkins' term, a trend which continued at a similar rate through Giuliani's two terms. Giuliani's crime crackdown seemed more about graffiti artists, squeegee men, and small time drug dealers than murderers.
Posted by: Cangrejero at June 20, 2007 01:57 PM8: Giuliani has "loads more" foreign policy credentials than GWB did?
Evidence, please.
Posted by: NCProsecutor at June 20, 2007 02:44 PMThey both came in with zero fp experience, and I'd expect a President Giuliani to be just as wise and successful.
Posted by: apostropher at June 20, 2007 02:53 PMNot that it really matter, though. When it comes down to GOP primary lever-pulling time, the abortion question will wreck Giuliani's hopes.
Posted by: apostropher at June 20, 2007 02:55 PMThis isn't going to help him in the primaries either.
Posted by: M/tch M/lls at June 20, 2007 04:34 PMGiuliani has exactly as much foreign policy experience as Bill Clinton did before he became President.
Posted by: Gaijin Biker at June 20, 2007 08:33 PMAnd Carter and Reagan. Since gubernatorial politics is the easiest route to Pennsylvania Avenue, this is generally going to be the case. So it comes down to who any given president chooses to advise him. Bush chose a bunch of wild-eyed, bomb-happy radicals, and now we stand knee-deep in shit as a result. As mayor, Giuliani's appointment wisdom is neatly summed up by Bernard Kerik.
Posted by: apostropher at June 20, 2007 09:11 PMMy complaint, though, isn't that Giuliani lacks foreign policy experience, it's that the media treats him as if he does. Best I can figure, solely because 9/11 happened mostly in NYC. However, disaster response ≠ foreign policy.
Posted by: apostropher at June 20, 2007 09:13 PMUnless you count it as part of his 9-11 response, you're forgetting that he also told that Saudi prince he could take his $10 million check and shove it up his ass. So he's also good at international diplomacy.
(Seriously, though, I thought that was awesome.)
Posted by: Gaijin Biker at June 21, 2007 12:39 AMContext, please... George W. Bush... Rudy Giuliani... George W. Bush... Rudy Giuliani...
A little soul-searching in the ranks of the Republican party should be welcomed all across the political spectrum.
Posted by: froz gobo at June 21, 2007 01:29 AMA little deeper perspective, please. Does anyone remember a small little war that a Dem president foisted on us, not so long afer Eisenhower warned of military-industrial complex? Are the extended American empire and defense establishment that produces so much trouble and lucre exclusively partisan Republican ventures?
The real problem is the continued expansion of government and resulting opportunities for corruption. Can we really expect the Dems to be much better, once they have exclusive run of the candy store?
Posted by: TokyoTom at June 21, 2007 02:24 PMCan we really expect the Dems to be much better, once they have exclusive run of the candy store?
At this present moment in time? Yes.
Posted by: M/tch M/lls at June 21, 2007 02:51 PMDoes anyone remember a small little war that a Dem president foisted on us, not so long afer Eisenhower warned of military-industrial complex?
The Democratic Party of 1964 bears precious little resemblance to the Democratic Party of 2007.
opportunities for corruption
Well, going by the past couple of decades, Democrats are mere pikers in the corruption game compared to Republicans. I mean, the best we can put up (William Jefferson of LA) isn't remotely in the same league with the GOP titleholder, Duke Cunningham. Beware letting the perfect be the enemy of the good, yo.
Posted by: apostropher at June 21, 2007 03:15 PMDoes anyone remember a small little war that a Dem president foisted on us, not so long afer Eisenhower warned of military-industrial complex?
Not to mention that big war that Roosevelt dragged us into. And can anyone really trust the Dems to care about civil rights given their past support for slavery?
Posted by: M/tch M/lls at June 21, 2007 03:32 PMRG: lied about Brooklyn Museum, Mary Mother of Jesus made of elephant dung hoopla. Also, I would like a leader that as the mind/balls/heart to deal effectively with the root of the problem. News flash, crime exists because poverty exists. RG's "crackdown" was a masquerade for his true agenda, which was to move out all low-income people, and turn NYC into a corporate suburb. Now, thanks to RG, you don't have to go to Missouri to kick it with right wing fascists, because NYC has become a beacon in their boon time, and is now crawling with them.
What I demand in a leader: top notch education (for all, hello), healthcare and public services, laws created to keep religious zealots out of my private life. Stop fanning the fires in the middle east.
This is possible.
We could be a happy and healthy nation.
I think it's funny how unsavory politicians and corporations use the people's morality against their own interests. I know that the corporations are not looking out for us, or trying to be "fair" with us, so why are we cutting them breaks?
I mean, how big can your yacht be?
This man I was speaking to said to me, "I was trained as a engineer, but they only make up to 150.000 a year (after taxes, that’s 10.000 a month), now I make that in a week."
This guy and people like him are so blinded by the big money they earn, that they will do totally unethical things to increase their earning potential.
It is time to wake up American people.
Dems need to decide that what they want IS the right thing, and that there is NO question. I mean, Martin Luther King wasn't like: "Okay, maybe segregation is wrong, but the other side has a point too..."
If you have no $$$$ for education, and you are not a person of incredible strength, what do you do? You can’t live on minimum wage?
Also, when did it become a bad thing to be a hard working person? In the 1950s a store clerk (my neighbor’s father) had three children, send them to a private school, owned his own house (jointly with his in-laws) and owned his own car. In our time a store clerk is told “If you wanted to be treated like a human being, you shouldn’t’ have been a store clerk.” THERE IS NO SHAME IN WORKING A J.O.B. PEOPLE! Let’s stop acting like it’s okay to pay people crap, and then get all high and mighty when crime rates soar.