Astronomers have created a 3D map of the unseeable dark matter in the universe, using Hubble Telescope data. What would a visual map of invisible matter look like, you may be wondering. Something like this (click the image for the full-size picture).
The three-dimensional map spans not only space, but also time, and stretches back to when the universe was only about half its present age. [...] Dark matter is distributed across the universe in thick clumps and fat filaments within which galaxies are anchored like set jewels. The map relied on data collected from more than half a million galaxies and spans a swath of the night sky that is nearly nine times the diameter of the full Moon. [...]
The new map reveals that as time passed, from the early universe to the more recent universe, dark matter became clumpier and less filamentary. This agrees with some current theories which state that the universe transitioned from a state in which matter—regular and dark—was relatively smoothly distributed to its current state, in which matter is more concentrated in some places than others. It is in these areas of high matter concentration that stars, galaxies and galaxy clusters reside. According to those same theories, dark matter began to coalesce into larger structures a little before normal matter did.
"It collapsed first into these filaments and clusters and provided the gravitational scaffolding into which normal matter—galaxies, planets, us—flowed," Massey said. "It's only because there's a lot of dark matter and it collapsed first that we can exist at all."
I firmly believe that they should call it "pixie dust" instead.
Posted by: M/tch M/lls at January 8, 2007 10:30 PMEnnybuddy know where I can find a comprehensible-to-the-layman description of the difference between dark and non-dark (shiny?) matter? Is dark matter composed of the same elementary particles or special dark ones?
Posted by: Clownæsthesiologist at January 9, 2007 08:45 AMHey! Ligate those a's and e's brother! I see you are edging gradually towards "angel dust".
Posted by: Clownæsthesiologist at January 9, 2007 09:42 AMIf the "three dimensional" model also spans time, doesn't that make it four dimensional?
Posted by: John Burns at January 9, 2007 01:21 PM"thick clumps and fat filaments"
It sounds to me like this is firm evidence that God has had his way with the universe and left his ... ahem ... paw prints all over it.
Posted by: SlouchingTom at January 10, 2007 02:23 AMNo, it's dark time.
It would be cool if dark matter had nonstandard, "dark" extension.
Posted by: Clownæsthesiologist at January 10, 2007 08:56 AMDidt'n that Sean Carroll fellow whose blog used to be called "Preposterous Universe" write a lot about dark matter and "dark energy" which I recall thinking was a much weirder concept than dark matter -- I mean matter could just be dark because there isn't any light shining on it right? -- but that doesn't apply to energy.
Posted by: Clownæsthesiologist at January 10, 2007 09:00 AMthe universe is something of a fractal. patterns of the large are duplicated in the smaller.... otherwise, all the metaphors we make would be really bad. i wonder what the massive dark matter structures are a metaphor of.
Posted by: Jon at January 10, 2007 09:53 PM