May 26, 2006

Finish what we Started

Posted by Froz Gobo

There's only one damn reason we have this immigration problem: We never finished what we started in 1848. God damnit, those lazy spics were sitting there on top of almost a million square miles of what would fortunately soon be liberated to this Country just not putting it to good use at all! What, a few missions and a few cattle ranches - 'scuse me, ranchos - and you call that a Country?

No way. It took Good Ol' American Know-How™ to set that part of the US of A in line, but alas we forgot to finish the job. Any self-respecting conquering nation owes its descendants - for the sake of a properly assimilated subjugate population - a renaming of places. So what follows, 158 years overdue but still not too late, are a few froz gobo recommendations for changes to the map.

Americans can name a place like nobody else, and some of our best ones are the westernmost and southernmost ones before Rand-McNally gets all Spickish: Flagstaff, Steamboat Springs, Salt Lake City, Fort! Worth!, for God's sake. You say that and you know exactly where the fuck you are and that you better not be navigating it in some low-riding el camino with fuzzy dice hanging from your mirror.

Yeah, these places need some fresh names to clear out the stuffy, 5-century old air in the place; let's start with a biggie: Los Angeles. Easy enough, call the whole place Hollywood. The sign's already on the hillside. It'll still be a Barbara Streisand-listening, George Clooney-loving, liberal mecca, but let's at least call it something respectable. Next up: San Antonio. No question here, it's Last Stand, Texas! Sam Houston would be proud.

A few more:
San Francisco: Quakeville, CA
El Paso: Hot Rocks, TX
San Diego: Balmy Bay, CA
Laredo: um... West Brownsville, TX
Santa Fe: Fe? Who the fuck is Fe? Iron? Ironville, NM!
Wait, New Mexico? Try Was Mexico. Ironville, Was Mexico, 87505. I like the ring of it.
Amarillo: Dear God, what self respecting people would name a town 'Yellow' for chrissake? How 'bout Panhandle Junction, TX
Las Vegas: What is a Vega, people? Neonland,.. Slotsville,.. Jackpot!, Nevada! With the exclamation point and everything. That'll be good for business.
The Rio Grande: C'mon, people. How on Earth do you expect them to see it as a barrier if it's called "Great River" in their language. "Come on in, Muchachos, the water's great!" No. River Styx. Except spell it with 2 x's. River Styxx looks like you mean business.
And finallly, my hometown, Sacramento. Hmm. Sacramentown sounds kinda stupid, as does Sacredville. Well, it's flat and we grow a lot of artichokes... Apostrophiles, I present you the newly renamed capital of the golden state: Artichoke Flats, California.

Hmm.... New Orleans....

TrackBack
Comments
1

Good start Froz, but besides the Spanish and French, don't we need to do something about all of those "Native American" names?

Posted by: TokyoTom at May 26, 2006 02:49 AM
2

Somehow, Artichoke Flats just sounds so western American.

Posted by: platosearwax at May 26, 2006 07:47 AM
3

Wow, you're from Sacto? Cool. I guess we have to rename Modesto -- how about McHenry, CA?

Posted by: The Modesto Kid at May 26, 2006 08:00 AM
4

'stead of Artichoke Flats (which sounds a bit too much like the title of a Steinbeck novel -- he was a commie wasn't he?), how about East Davis, CA?

Posted by: The Modesto Kid at May 26, 2006 08:02 AM
5

For Manteca we have a nice, mono-syllabic, Anglo-Saxon term handy -- Lard, CA.

Posted by: The Modesto Kid at May 26, 2006 08:10 AM
6

Was Mexico

I prefer Not Mexico.

Posted by: The Modesto Kid at May 26, 2006 11:10 AM
7

Santa Fe: Fe? Who the fuck is Fe? Iron?

That one will never sell. Knowing that Fe means iron is way too nerdy. I think Santa Claus, WM has a nice ring to it.

And as for Amarillo, what with the way us true Texans pronounce it, it already is no longer Spanish. The same holds true for Llano. Not to mention the streets in Austin named Guadalupe and Manchaca.

Posted by: M/tch M/lls at May 26, 2006 01:05 PM
8

I am shocked (shocked!) at the impiety of naming Sacramento, which is a perfectly blessed name if it weren't made filthy by its ferr'n sound, after a fruit. On my annual retreat the other day God told me to rename Sacramento to Prayer Canyon. I know there's no canyon there, so I guess we'd best show up with some backhoes and get to work. I see a little seed money - they don't call 'em angel investors for nothing - and then, one day, a theme park. Fun for the whole country. Hallelujah!

Posted by: Robust McManlyPants at May 26, 2006 01:40 PM
9

If was are going for historical accuracy, doesn't Sacramento have to be Sutterville or Fort Sutter?

Posted by: Idealist at May 26, 2006 02:43 PM
10

If was are going for historical accuracy, doesn't Sacramento have to be Sutterville or Fort Sutter?

In an ideal world, maybe. But we deal in reality around here.

Posted by: M/tch M/lls at May 26, 2006 02:59 PM
11

we deal in reality around here.

I've heard that claim . . . But back on topic, if we want reality, Sacramento has to be Reallyboringville.

Posted by: Idealist at May 26, 2006 03:06 PM
12

Reallyboringville sounds kind of nice if you say it in a heavy Ahnold accent.

Posted by: M/tch M/lls at May 26, 2006 03:25 PM
13

M/tch- you've got it right; it IS pronounced Gwaddle Loop, and bully to anyone who seyz otherwise.

And its Kay Nig road, screw that Koenig noise...

Posted by: Sterling at May 26, 2006 03:34 PM
14

Salida will henceforth be known as Exit, CA (though "No Exit" might be more appropriate). San Leandro I think we can refer to quite tersely, as "Leonards".

Posted by: The Modesto Kid at May 26, 2006 03:50 PM
15

M/tch- you've got it right; it IS pronounced Gwaddle Loop, and bully to anyone who seyz otherwise.

And don't forget MAN-shack.

At least we don't pronounce Houston HOW-ston, like those NYC freaks.

And I've been thinking: Texas supposedly takes its name from a Native American word. It was apparently pronounced Tay-hos, but for some reason the Spaniards over here spelled it with an "x", and what's a whitey to do but say it like it's spelled?

Anyway, the word apparently meant "friendship" or "friendly" or something all wussylike. Screw that. From here on out I think our great state should be called "Kixas".

Either that or "RealBarbecueLand".

Posted by: M/tch M/lls at May 26, 2006 04:28 PM
16

Fe isn't iron--it's faith, people. (Apo, you're from Sacto? Cool!)

Los Angeles has gotta become Disneyville, people. San Francisco? Screw political correctness. Gaytown.

Shit, California needs a new name. I suggest we just call it Goldie, thereby including all the things that are important: the gold rush, blondes, and drought--in one fell swoop. While we're at it, Nevada? Them Spanish-speakin' people are nuts: there's no fucking snow in Nevada. Deserta, let's call it. And Las Vegas? No goddamn meadow there. Neon City, people.

The Sierra Nevadas? Up north they call 'em the Cascades. Just move it on south, people.

Posted by: bitchphd at May 26, 2006 04:51 PM
17

I don't think I said "people" enough in that comment, did I? Fuckin' faux populism.

Posted by: bitchphd at May 26, 2006 04:52 PM
18

(Apo, you're from Sacto? Cool!)

Froz != Apo.

Posted by: The Modesto Kid at May 26, 2006 05:12 PM
19

Fe isn't iron--it's faith, people.

Spanish != The Periodic Table

Posted by: M/tch M/lls at May 26, 2006 06:22 PM
20

Just so it's clear, I wanted to stress that my previous comment was in no ways meant to impugn the knowldedge or capabilities of Mexican chemists.

Posted by: M/tch M/lls at May 26, 2006 06:51 PM
21

Isn't Seattle named after an Indian Chief?

New name: Grungebucksville.

Posted by: Gaijin Biker at May 27, 2006 07:41 AM
22

My vague recollection from a friend who lived in Washington (state) is that Seattle is named after a chief whose name was sacred and not meant to be spoken aloud. Fortunately we white folks managed to misspell it, so maybe that's okay.

Posted by: Rah at May 27, 2006 03:52 PM
23

East Davis?

I love that. So will it help bring the price of our rent in Davis down?

Posted by: DW at May 28, 2006 12:43 PM
24

Not as much as calling the whole Cap area 'North Stockton.'

Posted by: froz gobo at May 28, 2006 03:16 PM
25

'North Stockton.'

Or, North Lard.

Posted by: The Modesto Kid at May 28, 2006 08:56 PM
26

North Stockton? Now you're killing me. But really, why don't we just go for North Bakersfield and see if we can clear out the whole Central Valley?

Posted by: DW at May 29, 2006 10:22 PM
27

Froz != Apo. Oops, my bad.

I'll sign on to North Stockton and North Bakersfield. Seattle really oughta be Amazonville, though, on account of both the books and the lesbians.

Posted by: bitchphd at May 31, 2006 01:39 AM
28

Froz != Apo. Oops, my bad.

You still haven't apologized for disparaging the faith of Mexican chemists.

Posted by: M/tch M/lls at May 31, 2006 02:03 PM
29

That was you, M/tch. You really need to get some help with your identity issues.

Posted by: bitchphd at May 31, 2006 03:49 PM
30

I never disparaged the faith of Mexican chemists. In fact, I'm on record as saying that their faith is like iron.

Posted by: M/tch M/lls at May 31, 2006 04:23 PM
31

That, in fact, it IS iron. But one assumes that the nails in Christ's feet and hands were made of iron. Are you saying, then, that the faith of Mexicans is what crucified Our Lord? It's an interesting counterpart to the Jew theory, but somewhat ahistorical, don't you think?

Posted by: bitchphd at May 31, 2006 10:30 PM
32

I'm pretty sure a number of people named Jesus have been killed by Mexicans.

Posted by: apostropher at May 31, 2006 10:49 PM
33

Notice that nowhere did I use the name "Jesus."

Posted by: bitchphd at June 1, 2006 12:16 AM
34

B, nails don't crucify people, JewsRomans crucify people.

Do you still deny that Fe = Iron?

Posted by: M/tch M/lls at June 1, 2006 10:03 AM
35

Hmmm, now why didn't the <strike> tags work on "Jews"?

Posted by: M/tch M/lls at June 1, 2006 10:04 AM
36

I think you forgot the semicolons. Either that, or they are even more powerful than I suspected.

Posted by: apostropher at June 1, 2006 11:34 AM
37

I'm supposed to use semicolons? Nobody told me about any semicolons!

Where should they be placed?

And just how powerful do you suspect semicolons are anyway?

Posted by: M/tch M/lls at June 1, 2006 01:07 PM
38

In case it wasn't clear from the above, I really didn't know you needed semicolons, and I don't know where to place them. Help!

Posted by: M/tch M/lls at June 1, 2006 02:07 PM
39

M/inM/, I think apostropher was referring to the reason your html did not work in the post asking why the <strike> tag did not work -- in that comment you forgot to put a semicolon following &lt which caused it not to render properly on non-IE browsers. However that does not go to answer the question you are asking about the strike tag.

Posted by: The Modesto Kid at June 1, 2006 03:07 PM
40

&lt;strike&gt; should yield <strike>

Posted by: apostropher at June 1, 2006 03:22 PM
41

And just how powerful do you suspect semicolons are anyway?

Depends. The Jewish semicolons control Hollywood and the world banking system, as I understand it. The rest of the semicolons are just cogs in the machine.

Posted by: apostropher at June 1, 2006 03:24 PM
42

Right but I understood M/inM/ to be asking, not why his "<strike>" didn't show up when he asked the question (at 10:04), but why when he entered that tag into the comments box (at 10:03) it did cause the text which it enclosed to be rendered with strikethrough.

Posted by: The Modesto Kid at June 1, 2006 03:46 PM
43

Yeah, I meant to strike through the Jews in the 10:03 post, but somehow they resisted. Or does the word "Jews" in that post show up as stricken through in your browser?

And yep, I'm using IE and forgot about needing semicolons after the & symbol for other browsers. I think in my brain I was just assuming that it only applied to umlauts. Stupid.

I guess now you'll accuse me of mis-using semicolons.

Posted by: M/tch M/lls at June 1, 2006 05:07 PM
44

But really and truly, I want to know, how does one achieve the strikethrough effect on apostropher?

Posted by: M/tch M/lls at June 1, 2006 06:30 PM
45

test

Posted by: apostropher at June 1, 2006 06:52 PM
46

Huh. I have no idea.

Posted by: apostropher at June 1, 2006 06:53 PM
47

Damn Jews!

Posted by: M/tch M/lls at June 1, 2006 07:06 PM
48

No. It's umlauts (from Umlautstan), not Jews, that have historically abused semicolons. And asterisks run the world banking system.

Posted by: froz gobo at June 1, 2006 07:20 PM
49

No, wait, asteroids run the world banking system. My bad.

Posted by: froz gobo at June 1, 2006 07:22 PM
50

Huh. I have no idea.

Maybe we should ask whoever it is what runs this site to get their shit together and get us some strikethroughs?

Posted by: M/tch M/lls at June 1, 2006 07:52 PM
51

Froz -- pay obeisance to your (m)aster!

Posted by: The Modesto Kid at June 1, 2006 07:57 PM
52

Dear God, No! NO! TMK, I really, really need to get some work done today. Why did you have to do that?

Posted by: froz gobo at June 2, 2006 10:23 AM
53

Come on Froz, get those asteroids! The future of galactic civilization depends on it!

Posted by: The Modesto Kid at June 2, 2006 11:36 AM
54

I'd like to request a name change for a town close to Pittsburgh called North Versailles.

Pronounced North Vursales.

Of course.

Ain't no Frenchies allowed.

North Freedomtown?

Posted by: Cala at June 7, 2006 07:38 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?