While John Gibson's and Bill O'Reilly's "War on Christmas" truly exists only in their own cavernous noggins, let me go ahead and own up: I really, really, really hate this time of year. Oh, I like winter. I love the cold weather and fires, the lights and tinsel are pretty, even the kitschy turbo-displays are amusing, and I'm always happy to get a few days off of work, but Christmas? Humbug. Why? Mostly it's the water-torture effect of hearing the same 15 songs everywhere I go FOR A SOLID MONTH EVERY GODDAMNED YEAR OF MY LIFE. They started piping them in to the bathroom at work just after Thanksgiving, for crying out loud. I can't even sit down and take a crap without my chestnuts roasting on an open fire.
I know this is a touch neurotic but, you know, it's my own neurosis and I'm sticking to it. Screw you, Bing Crosby. Anyhow, I actually like my family and my in-laws, so the holidays aren't remotely oppressive to me on that level. My humbuggery is mostly based around having "Rocking Around the Christmas Tree" or some other bit of treacly crap getting stuck in my head for hours at a time (dammit, I just did it again - aaaughhh, get it out! Get it out!). I honestly don't begrudge anybody celebrating Christmas however they see fit, though this insistence that private merchants use specific greetings is just downright bizarre. Apparently, Merry Christmas is the new fuck you.
So in this spirit, I'd like to note that boozy ol' Chris Hitchens has taken a short break from pointing out my deep personal love for Saddam Hussein to pen one barn-burningly grinchy column at Slate comparing December in America to every day in North Korea. 9/11 may have pushed Hitch over the edge of contrarian warmongering lunacy, but he's still one hell of a writer when he's annoyed. Behold.
[C]ompulsory worship and compulsory adoration can indeed become a touch wearying to the spirit. Our Christian enthusiasts are evidently too stupid, as well as too insecure, to appreciate this. A revealing mark of their insecurity is their rage when public places are not annually given over to religious symbolism, and now, their fresh rage when palaces of private consumption do not follow suit. The Fox News campaign against Wal-Mart and other outlets—whose observance of the official feast-day is otherwise fanatical and punctilious to a degree, but a degree that falls short of unswerving orthodoxy—is one of the most sinister as well as one of the most laughable campaigns on record. If these dolts knew anything about the real Protestant tradition, they would know that it was exactly this paganism and corruption that led Oliver Cromwell—my own favorite Protestant fundamentalist—to ban the celebration of Christmas altogether.
No believer in the First Amendment could go that far. But there are millions of well-appointed buildings all across the United States, most of them tax-exempt and some of them receiving state subventions, where anyone can go at any time and celebrate miraculous births and pregnant virgins all day and all night if they so desire. These places are known as "churches," and they can also force passersby to look at the displays and billboards they erect and to give ear to the bells that they ring. In addition, they can count on numberless radio and TV stations to beam their stuff all through the ether. If this is not sufficient, then god damn them. God damn them everyone.
Love it.
TrackBackMy main beef against the "OMG their is teh war on Christmas!!1!" crowd is that it's just plain damn lazy of them. It's their religion, let them evangelize it. Instead, they want science teachers to do their creationism for them, Bush to do their various nutjobberies for them and Wal-Mart to wish people a Merry Christmas for them.
When did these yahoos quit being the "by your own bootstraps" crowd and turn into the spiritual equivalent of the fictional welfare queens they've despised for so long?
Posted by: Robust McManlyPants at December 22, 2005 04:16 PMGreat point, yo. I'd never thought of it in those terms.
Posted by: apostropher at December 22, 2005 04:20 PMThank you!
The reason, by the way, is that having to do their own legwork would involve acknowledging that they are not, in fact, in overt and explicit control of everything and everyone. In fact, forcing everyone else to do their Merry Christmasing for them helps prop up their charade that they are in overt and explicit control of everything and everyone.
As an added bonus, once they lay claim to being in overt and explicit control of everything and everyone they can both take it easy on the whole religion thing personally, freeing them from the cumbersome task of spreading the peace and love their religion describes, and they can reinforce their current effort to tie their religious views directly to our national identity, using each to prop up the other, by pointing at the false statement that they control everyone and everything as proof that we are "a Christian nation," and that any deviation from strict fundamentalist orthodoxy is inherently anti-American, and vice versa. (Breathe! Sorry about that run-on.) Each concept requires artificial proof to support its false assertions, and each needs the other to prop itself up.
Posted by: Robust McManlyPants at December 22, 2005 05:22 PMFresh look, RMMP. However, the orchestrators know it's religion=politics for many people. Frame it as a political debate against "dem durty libuurls," and it gives the weak-minded something to fly the flag on.
Posted by: TrickL-D at December 22, 2005 10:16 PMThis current sentimental "tradition" of gift giving all around goes all the way back to the ancient scribe, Charles Dickens, who provided the truly profound inspiration to a group of New York merchants for a really great way to perk up an otherwise dismal sales season for things other than vegetables in Mason jars and coal. Of course part of it may commemorate one of America's key military victories, celebrating George Washington's capping of the Hessians shortly after they'd finished rockin' round the Christmas tree, a holiday tradition affirmed by those who thought up the Yule tree in the first place, when they merrily started the Battle of the Bulge. Now THERE was a war on Chrstmas! Peace on Earth, Y'all.
Posted by: Retired Catholic at December 25, 2005 09:15 AMWhat bugs me the most is that just when I have time to watch, TV goes to hell. No new shows, just the same Christmas crap year after year. Fuck you, Frosty.
Posted by: Charles Watkins at December 29, 2005 11:12 AMWe need to tie all those knuckle draggers up and make them watch 'Bad Santa' until their eyeballs start bleeding.
Posted by: mikefromtexas at December 30, 2005 12:59 AM