My personal preference would be something more along the lines of this punishment, but since we don't allow it, I'll settle for the nine-year sentence instead. Could we get that time served in Guantanamo Bay, please?
A man convicted in the nation's first felony case against illegal spamming was sentenced to nine years in prison Friday for bombarding Internet users with millions of junk e-mails. Prosecutors said Jeremy Jaynes used the Internet to peddle pornography and sham products and services such as a "FedEx refund processor," and at the time of his arrest was considered among the top 10 spammers in the world. Thousands of people fell for his e-mails, and prosecutors said Jaynes' operation grossed up to $750,000 per month.
Jaynes, 30, was convicted in November for using false Internet addresses and aliases to send mass e-mail ads through an AOL server in Loudoun County, where America Online is based. Under Virginia law, sending unsolicited bulk e-mail itself is not a crime unless the sender masks his identity.
The NC native will remain out of jail while the case is appealed, but even if he manages to get it overturned, I hope the past year has been 365 days of pure, existential, sphincter-tightening terror for Mr. Jaynes. If anybody has his email address handy, I'd like to send him some information about my services as a legal fees refund processor.
TrackBackAnd Eric Rudolph is pleading guilty. It's days like today that make me wish prisons were even worse than they are.
Posted by: Robust McManlyPants at April 8, 2005 02:52 PMIf the guy had killed someone, he wouldn't serve 9 years.
Posted by: merlallen at April 8, 2005 04:26 PMThis guy is a thief. He stole minutes of my sweet, precious time. Across all of humanity, he probably robbed us all of many lifetimes of time. I have no problem with his sentence.
Posted by: fiend at April 8, 2005 06:12 PMHe broke the law, he goes to jail, blah, blah blah... I just can't get that worked up about spam. I get something like 300+ spam emails a day, but with a little effort I've got my system set up so I only see 3 or 4. Granted, the stuff I get via email is usually worse than the postal mail junk, but considering that I fill half a recycle basket each week with envelopes I don't even bother to open, I'd much rather be going after paper junk mailers than electronic ones.
When I get annoyed at spam I get annoyed at the people who designed a system that lets you get away with making up your FROM address with no verification whatsoever, not the people who exploited the stupidity.
Posted by: Dug Steen at April 8, 2005 06:54 PMSMTP is a relic of a simpler time, Dug. It should have evolved with the times, but two things at least held it back. One, verification is a much thornier problem than one might think. Two, the difficulty of evolving a wildly popular standard is the wild popularity of the standard. Well, and three, there are powerful entities whose interests are well served by an insecure, unreliable, universal message system.
Posted by: fiend at April 8, 2005 07:17 PMI get pissed at spam, too, but, man, $750,000 a month?? For that kind of money, I'd have to consider the weight of the benefit to myself compared the cost to others. Can't say I wouldn't at least be tempted to consider in favor of the benefit to myself.
Posted by: Michael at April 8, 2005 08:38 PMOf course, I'd also have to lie to myself and pretend no one was actually opening the spam I was sending them. But when bad faith enters in, your utilitarian argument is probably in danger. *sigh*
Posted by: Michael at April 8, 2005 08:39 PMIt's not just stealing precious minutes of our lives, but money and probably health, too. I mean, half or more of the Viagra sold through spammers is fake, and that puts people who respond to this in a lot of danger. The man has preyed on society, and I'm glad that he's been stopped.
One thing I'd be very interested in is the profile of the person who responds positively to the spam (and who presumably drive this system, as opposed to the stuck-in-evolution SMTP standard that enables the system). And then find a way to show them reality-based alternatives.
Posted by: John Johnson at April 8, 2005 09:00 PMYeah, it's not like this guy was using spam to raise money for limbless orphans. He was a spammer who was stealing network resources in order to peddle false offers. He was a thief, a liar and a con artist. This don't hate the player, hate the game attitude is bullshit. Hate 'em both. Fuck 'im.
As fiend said, SMTP is a relic of its time. To blame it is to blame Henry Ford for the obnoxiousness of the Ford Excursion.
Posted by: Robust McManlyPants at April 9, 2005 09:03 AMHow else am I going to enlarge my penis?
Seriously, Jeremy Jaynes should have SPAMMING ASSHOLE carved all over his body - with toenail clippers - by the 1st 50 people in his address book. And then he should be forced to pay all 50 people $1,000.00 if they finish in the next 24 hours and pass this along to 5 more friends from their address book.
Posted by: Joel at April 9, 2005 10:25 AM