So, let me get this straight:

1. Man meets woman, gets a little close, invites her back to his place.

2. They have a little hanky panky and an appetizer, but not the main course. (I.e. no reasonable expectation of pregnancy.)

3. Woman secretly saves the sperm, and uses it to get pregnant.

4. Two years later, woman sues man and gets $800 in child support.

Is it just me, or is this a miscarriage of justice?

Whew, complications.

So if I give my Dad a shotgun for Christmas then I am liable for the carnage if he shoots up McDonalds?

Weird. I suppose to be completely safe one should have a pre-exchange legal agreement that is signed before any gifts are made.

And let's expand this. What if the woman takes the "gift" and offers it on the internet for a thousand women to use? Is the man now responsible for a thousand love-children?

Heh, heh, he said "hard"

Heh, heh, he said "swallow"

"There's a 5-year-old child here," Mirabelli said. "Imagine how a child feels when your father says he feels emotionally damaged by your birth."

It's not normal for you dad to say to you that you've emotionally damaged him?

Mr. Johnson, a miscarriage would have been justice.

Unfortunately for men everywhere, from a legal liability standpoint spitting is now preferable to swallowing. This should be added to sex education curricula at once.

Funny, sperm never came up when we studied the UCC on Bulk Transfers.