December 21, 2004

A few bad apples.

Posted by apostropher

Apparently they hadn't fallen far from the tree Bush.

A document released for the first time today by the American Civil Liberties Union suggests that President Bush issued an Executive Order authorizing the use of inhumane interrogation methods against detainees in Iraq. Also released by the ACLU today are a slew of other records including a December 2003 FBI e-mail that characterizes methods used by the Defense Department as "torture" and a June 2004 "Urgent Report" to the Director of the FBI that raises concerns that abuse of detainees is being covered up. [...] The documents were obtained after the ACLU and other public interest organizations filed a lawsuit against the government for failing to respond to a Freedom of Information Act request.

The two-page e-mail that references an Executive Order states that the President directly authorized interrogation techniques including sleep deprivation, stress positions, the use of military dogs, and "sensory deprivation through the use of hoods, etc." The ACLU is urging the White House to confirm or deny the existence of such an order and immediately to release the order if it exists. The FBI e-mail, which was sent in May 2004 from "On Scene Commander--Baghdad" to a handful of senior FBI officials, notes that the FBI has prohibited its agents from employing the techniques that the President is said to have authorized.

Another e-mail, dated December 2003, describes an incident in which Defense Department interrogators at Guantánamo Bay impersonated FBI agents while using "torture techniques" against a detainee. The e-mail concludes "If this detainee is ever released or his story made public in any way, DOD interrogators will not be held accountable because these torture techniques were done [sic] the ‘FBI’ interrogators. The FBI will [sic] left holding the bag before the public." [torturing the English language as well, I see - 'r] [...]

The June 2004 "Urgent Report" addressed to the FBI Director is heavily redacted. The legible portions of the document appear to describe an account given to the FBI’s Sacramento Field Office by an FBI agent who had "observed numerous physical abuse incidents of Iraqi civilian detainees," including "strangulation, beatings, [and] placement of lit cigarettes into the detainees ear openings." The document states that "[redacted] was providing this account to the FBI based on his knowledge that [redacted] were engaged in a cover-up of these abuses."

The documents are here. This is what you voted for, America; it is not a by-product of your vote, you can't claim you didn't know about it. You. Voted. For. This. We are now officially a torture state. Do you feel proud? Do you feel righteous? Do you feel all warm and safe and Christian? Because mostly I just feel sick. Every day I watch the Bush family and its band of Rasputins smugly wiping their asses with our flag and our Constitution, I get a little angrier. Not so much at the administration - they are just doing what comes naturally and what they plainly promised to do - but at the voters who returned them to power. You did this to my country.

shame   dead-iraqi1.jpg

Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free. We'll show them what for.

TrackBack
Comments
1

I thought we were outsourcing this. Guess we decided to keep it in-house.

I think I might toss my cookies now. Literally.

Posted by: John Johnson at December 21, 2004 11:47 AM
2

OK, so let's say it's proven that Bush signed the order - is that impeachable? People like me know this BS is plainly, morally wrong, but is it illegal?

Gods, I hope so. If it isn't, someone in Congress needs to build their career on setting right any laws or legal loopholes that make it possible for us to be this evil without consequence.

Posted by: Robust McManlyPants at December 21, 2004 12:14 PM
3

So if lying to the public is an impeachable offense (define 'is'), can anyone please explain to me how that HASN'T happened to gwb yet?

Posted by: Karyn at December 21, 2004 01:17 PM
4

So if lying to the public is an impeachable offense

It isn't, unless it's under oath.

Posted by: apostropher at December 21, 2004 01:33 PM
5

People like me know this BS is plainly, morally wrong, but is it illegal?

Good question. If the proponents of the unitary executive theory have their way, nothing a president does would be illegal, so long as it was part of a war. Sound like a fringe theory? It enjoys healthy support on the Supreme Court.

Posted by: apostropher at December 21, 2004 01:37 PM
6

One of the tactics listed in the report was draping a naked prisioner with the Israeli flag while flashing a strobe light in his face. Um, are they actively attempting to create MORE terrorists?

Posted by: Casey at December 23, 2004 11:32 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?