American astronomers will announce the discovery of a tenth planet/planetoid orbiting the Sun, beyond Pluto. The body, roughly the size of Pluto, orbits in the Kuiper Belt in an elliptical orbit between 6 and 84 billion miles from Earth, and has been named Sedna, after the angry Inuit goddess of the ocean. She was forced to marry a dog by her father, who then drowned the dog after Sedna bore his puppies, and was then tricked into marrying a white raven. When the raven attacked the boat in which she and her father were escaping, her father threw her overboard. As she tried to climb back into the boat, he cut off her fingers, which became the whales and other large sea mammals that accompany her in the frigid Arctic waters.
Sedna was discovered by scientists from the California Institute of Technology's Palomar observatory near San Diego, and was confirmed by sightings from the Hubble and Spitzer space telescopes. As the most distant object yet discovered in heliocentic orbit, "it never gets above 400 degrees below Fahrenheit. And it's so far away that if you were on Sedna and looking back at the sun, an astronomer says you could block it out with the head of a pin." One orbit around the sun takes 10,500 earth years. As with Pluto, Sedna's status as a full-fledged planet is up for debate.
TrackBackI hadn't seen the 10,500 figure for the orbit length... it's amazing that it's so much longer than Pluto's, which if I'm not mistakenis only 246 years. Have you seen anything about the shape of the orbit? That's what really interests me... whether it's elongated and off-kilter like Pluto's.
Posted by: paul at March 16, 2004 09:30 AMYep, highly elliptical, so that its distance from the sun at the furthest point is 84 billion miles. Pluto's most heliodistant point is a little over 4-1/2 billion miles. So Sedna gets waaaay out there - it just happens to be "close" right now. I don't really grasp how it manages to stay in orbit at that far of a distance. The gravitational pull has to be awfully near to non-existent at that point.
Posted by: apostropher at March 16, 2004 09:41 AM